Good Moral Character: What It Means in Immigration Law
The phrase "good moral character" appears throughout immigration law — it is required to become a U.S. citizen, and it matters for several forms of relief from removal. But what does it actually mean? The law does not define good moral character with a single positive test; instead, it lists things that prevent a finding of good moral character, and then leaves room for other reasons. Understanding how this works is important for anyone whose case turns on it. This guide explains, in plain English.
This is general information, not legal advice. The rules below come directly from 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f) — the section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that addresses good moral character — as published in the U.S. Code by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel. Whether any of it applies to a specific case is a legal judgment that depends on the facts.
How the law approaches "good moral character"
The statute takes a distinctive approach. Rather than defining what good moral character is, § 1101(f) lists categories of conduct that mean a person cannot be found to have good moral character during the relevant period. In other words, the law works mostly by exclusion — describing what disqualifies a person, during the period for which good moral character must be shown.
The "relevant period" matters. For most cases, good moral character is assessed over a specific statutory period (for example, the years leading up to a naturalization application), so conduct within that window is what generally counts — though, as explained below, some issues reach further back.
The statutory bars
Under § 1101(f), a person generally cannot be found to have good moral character if, during the relevant period, they fall into listed categories, including someone who:
- is or was a habitual drunkard;
- falls within certain criminal-related classes of inadmissibility (for example, certain crimes and controlled-substance offenses) — with a narrow carve-out for a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana;
- derives income principally from illegal gambling or has been convicted of certain gambling offenses;
- gave false testimony for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit;
- was confined to a penal institution as a result of a conviction for an aggregate of 180 days or more; or
- engaged in other specified serious conduct the statute lists.
Each of these has technical detail, but the pattern is clear: certain conduct, during the period in question, blocks a finding of good moral character.
The permanent bar
One category stands apart. Under § 1101(f)(8), a person who "at any time has been convicted of an aggravated felony" cannot be found to have good moral character — and the phrase "at any time" is critical. Unlike most bars, which look at the relevant period, the aggravated-felony bar is generally permanent: it reaches back regardless of when the conviction occurred.
This is one reason an "aggravated felony" (a defined term in immigration law that does not always match how a crime is labeled in criminal court) is so consequential. It can permanently prevent a finding of good moral character, which in turn can permanently affect eligibility for naturalization and other relief.
The "catch-all": bars are not the whole story
Here is a point that surprises many people. The statute expressly states that not being within any of the listed classes does NOT guarantee a finding of good moral character. In its words, the fact that a person is not within the listed categories "shall not preclude a finding that for other reasons such person is or was not of good moral character."
This catch-all means the analysis is not just a checklist. Even conduct that does not fall within a specific statutory bar can lead to a finding of lacking good moral character, based on the overall facts. It is why good moral character is ultimately a fact-specific determination, not a mechanical one.
Why this matters across immigration law
Because good moral character is required for naturalization and factors into forms of relief like cancellation of removal, a problem with it can affect very different kinds of cases. And because the analysis combines specific statutory bars, a permanent aggravated-felony bar, and a discretionary catch-all, whether a person meets the standard is often a genuine legal question — not something that can be assumed either way.
Why a careful review pays off
Anyone whose case depends on good moral character — especially with any criminal history, an old conviction, or a past immigration issue — benefits from a careful review before filing. Identifying whether a statutory bar applies, whether the aggravated-felony permanent bar is a concern, and how the catch-all might be viewed can prevent a surprise denial and shape the strongest possible case.
Talk to a lawyer about your case
If you are pursuing naturalization or relief from removal and have any concern about good moral character, a review of your specific history can clarify where you stand. Carlos Maury Law is a national firm of former U.S. Immigration Judges. To talk about your situation, call (213) 769-0050. We speak Spanish.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "good moral character" in immigration law?
Good moral character is a requirement for naturalization and several forms of relief. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f), the law does not define it positively; instead it lists conduct that prevents a finding of good moral character during the relevant period, and leaves room for other reasons.
What can disqualify someone from good moral character?
The statute lists categories including being a habitual drunkard, certain criminal and controlled-substance offenses, deriving income principally from illegal gambling, giving false testimony for an immigration benefit, and being confined for 180 days or more as a result of a conviction, among others.
Is an aggravated felony a permanent bar to good moral character?
Generally yes. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(8), a person convicted of an aggravated felony "at any time" cannot be found to have good moral character. Unlike most bars, this one reaches back regardless of when the conviction occurred, making it effectively permanent.
If I avoid all the listed bars, am I automatically found to have good moral character?
No. The statute specifically says that not falling within the listed categories does not preclude a finding of lacking good moral character for other reasons. It is a fact-specific determination, not just a checklist.
---
This article is general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship. Immigration law is complex and fact-specific; consult a qualified immigration attorney about your situation. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney advertising.